Saturday, January 12, 2013
Graphs are misleading
Friday, January 11, 2013
Proclamation-Based Principles of Parenting and Supportive Scholarship
I just read the Proclamation-Based Principles of Parenting and Supportive Scholarship by Craig H. Hart and Lloyd D. Newell (1) and Lisa L. Sine. They do a good job at talking about traditional views of children ( innately evil, blank slate and inertly good) over time and explaining a LDS perspective (born Innocent with potential either way). One of my favorite things which was mentioned was spanking. Lately I have been hearing a lot of NO SPANKING EVER arguments and judgments for parents who do spank that they are abusive. They said "A body of scientific literature suggests that “non-abusive” spanking consisting of one or two mild slaps on the buttocks in limited situations (e.g., out-of-control behavior that poses danger
to the child or others) can be beneficial as a last resort, but only for children between two and six years of age. It can be particularly beneficial when backing up other discipline measures that have failed (e.g., reasoning with child or withdrawing privileges), or when conducted infrequently in the context of a warm and responsive relationship.". They also mention that a child's temperament should be taken into account when determining if spanking would be effective. I personally didn't respond to being spanked, but when my stuffed animal were put in prison (the top of the fridge) for my misbehavior I was sympathetic to their need to get out of there and would change my behavior. what was also talked about was parenting types : coercive passive and authoritative (not to be mixed up with authoritarianism). That coercive will use force, hostility and threatening to make their children be good. This makes it highly likely that the child will have negative effects. Passive parenting is that you just let them go. Sometime this over indulges the child, but often it just leads to instability. Sometimes kids come out with a positive experiences some times a negative, but they are usually defiant to authority Authoritative parents are those who set up firm boundaries with way that they can be negotiated for more autonomy (self reliance) in the child's life and that they work more for showing love than just correcting their child. Another key point in being an authoritative parent is being able to apologize when you make mistakes (which you will no matter how hard you try). I think that this has really opened my mind to what kind of parent I want to be.
PS: This is a link to the proclamation referred to in the article https://www.lds.org/topics/family-proclamation
Thursday, January 10, 2013
The Anatomy of peace : resolving the heart of conflict (the Arbinger institute)
For my parenting class I am reading The Anatomy of Peace. I was expecting it to be a chapter by chapter look into different subjects which help in creating peace. It is actually told in a story about parents dropping off their troubled kids for a program to promote positive change in the kids, but is really addressing how the parents need to change as well for anything to be long lasting. I like the book thus far and would read more of it now if I didn't have so much school work to do. I'll edit this blog until I have reached the end. For right now the thing I have pulled from it is that we should be focusing on what is going wrong when trying to help people or make an environment of peace, but focusing on helping things go right. That means not criticizing and correcting all the time. Instead finding ways to promote positivism.
picture from the book |
Wednesday, January 9, 2013
Do parents matter?
Craig H. Hart wrote the article Combating the myth that parents don't matter where he brings up research on how a parents interaction with their children effect that kind of person they are. With so many Homosexual rights activists out there many articles have been published that show that heterosexual parents are unnecessary because men and women don't bring unique contribution to the helping and development of a child. This is untrue. a "natural family" using the correct tools will be able to give their children great success even more than that of a single or cohabitation parents. It gives children a place to see how interactions should work and especially for fathers it shows girls how they should be treated. I find it interesting that fatherhood had been so attacked because fathers are often the bread winners of the family and not at home as much as a mother. Studies have shown that fathers matter. I know that fathers matter. I wouldn't have chosen my husband if not for the example of my Dad in how he treated my mother when I was younger. My mom nurtured me and my dad pushed me out into the world with the knowledge that both of my parents would be there for me.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)